CMA veterinary market guide

Last reviewed: 16 May 2026 Published: 16 May 2026

Corporate vs independent vets: what pet owners should know

A neutral, source-backed guide explaining the difference between corporate and independent vet practices, what ownership can and cannot tell you, and how to use this information when comparing options.

If you look up your local vet practice, you might find it trades under a familiar name but is owned by a large national or international group. Or it might be independently owned by a vet or group of vets. Both are common.

Understanding the difference can be useful — but it is important to be clear about what ownership does and does not tell you.

Source note: This guide is based on the CMA's veterinary market investigation final decision report and supporting materials, in particular Parts A, B and Appendices B and F. It does not provide veterinary, legal or financial advice. It does not imply that any ownership model is better or worse for pet care quality.


What do "corporate" and "independent" mean?

Corporate practice — a practice owned by a larger company or group, which may own many practices across the UK or internationally. The company may have shareholders, external investors, or be part of a wider corporate structure.

Independent practice — a practice owned by one or more vets or individuals, not as part of a larger company or group. Day-to-day decisions are typically made locally.

There is a spectrum between these two points. Some practices are part of smaller regional groups. Some are franchise-style arrangements. Ownership structures can be complex. WisePet records ownership data based on available information and provides methodology notes about how this is assessed.


What the CMA found

CMA materials report that large corporate groups increased their share of UK veterinary practices from around 10% in 2013 to over 60% at the time of the investigation (CMA final report, Part A and summary). Six large corporate groups are named in the CMA's report: CVS, IVC Evidensia, Linnaeus, Medivet, Pets at Home (Vets4Pets), and VetPartners.

The CMA's investigation also found that many pet owners did not know their practice was part of a group, and that this lack of transparency made it harder for them to compare options or understand where to raise concerns.

The CMA's concern was not that corporate ownership is bad. The investigation focused on whether pet owners had enough information to make informed choices — about prices, ownership and services — and whether competition was working effectively in the veterinary market.

See also: CMA vet reforms explained and Who owns your local vet practice?.


What ownership can tell you

Knowing who owns your vet practice can help you:

  • Understand whether nearby practices are connected — if several local practices are part of the same group, the effective range of independent options in your area may be more limited than it appears.
  • Know where to direct complaints or concerns — a group-owned practice may have a group-level complaints process in addition to local routes.
  • Ask more informed questions about policies — for example, whether pricing, referral arrangements or prescription policies are set locally or by a group policy.
  • Understand branding — some practices trade under a familiar local name that does not reflect their current ownership.

What ownership cannot tell you

Ownership alone does not tell you:

  • Whether a practice gives good clinical care
  • Whether prices are high or low relative to other local options
  • Whether staff are experienced or empathetic
  • Whether the practice communicates clearly
  • Whether it is the right fit for your pet's needs

For those assessments, you need to look at prices, services, opening hours, reviews, what is included in appointments, and your own experience.


How to use ownership information

Use ownership as one of several inputs, not as a ranking or quality score:

  1. Check who owns your practice using the WisePet ownership lookup or by asking the practice directly.
  2. Check whether local alternatives are independent or from the same group — useful context if you are comparing options.
  3. Compare prices and services between practices regardless of ownership using WisePet.
  4. Read reviews and ask around locally.
  5. Ask the practice directly about anything that matters to you — pricing, referral routes, complaints processes, who makes clinical decisions.

Ownership data on WisePet

WisePet records ownership data based on our current dataset and available sources. Ownership classifications are our best assessment based on available information and may not reflect the most recent corporate changes. If you believe a practice's ownership is recorded incorrectly, please report it.

Ownership data can change as groups acquire or divest practices. We note the date of our data snapshot where relevant.

See also: WisePet methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Are corporate vets worse than independent vets?

No. Ownership alone does not determine the quality of care. Both corporate and independent practices can provide excellent care, and both can fall short. Ownership is useful context — it helps you understand whether practices are connected, how decisions are made, and where to find policies or complaints routes. It is not a quality score.

Are independent vets always better or cheaper?

No. Independent practices vary widely in quality, price, services and communication, just as corporate practices do. An independent practice is not automatically cheaper, more personal or better — and a corporate practice is not automatically worse. Compare based on price, services, location, opening hours, reviews and transparency.

What does the CMA say about corporate ownership?

CMA materials report that large corporate groups increased their share of UK veterinary practices from around 10% in 2013 to over 60% at the time of the investigation (CMA final report Part A and summary). The CMA's concern was not that corporate ownership is inherently bad, but that pet owners often did not know who owned their practice and that this reduced their ability to make informed comparisons. Ownership transparency is one of the CMA's key remedies.

How do I find out who owns my local vet?

Use the WisePet ownership lookup at /who-owns-my-vet/ to check the current ownership classification for practices in our dataset. You can also ask the practice directly — the CMA's remedies include requirements around ownership transparency.

Does it matter if nearby practices are owned by the same group?

It can be useful to know. If several local practices are owned by the same group, that may reduce the range of genuinely independent options available to you. The CMA examined this as part of its competition assessment. Ownership data is one input when assessing local choice — not the only one.

What is a first-opinion practice?

A first-opinion practice (sometimes called an FOP) is the kind of vet practice most pet owners visit for routine care. It is distinct from a referral or specialist practice, which takes cases referred by a first-opinion vet. The CMA focused primarily on the first-opinion practice market.